Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Nicolas Cage on Joe, the Calming Effect of Venomous Snakes, and Why He’s Been So “Over-the-Top” in Movies Lately


Nicalicious

Status: Offline
Posts: 6722
Date: 10:48 AM, 09/12/13
Nicolas Cage on Joe, the Calming Effect of Venomous Snakes, and Why He’s Been So “Over-the-Top” in Movies Lately
Permalink  
 


Good interview here, Nic always seems to have something to say that makes it so much more interesting than the usual interviews!

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/oscars/2013/09/nicolas-cage-joe-toronto-film-festival

Nicolas Cage on Joe, the Calming Effect of Venomous Snakes, and Why He’s Been So “Over-the-Top” in Movies Lately


 
 


Nicolas Cage has spent so much time in the amped-up action-thriller genre of late that when the Oscar winner premiered Joe, a subtle and moving drama, at the Toronto Film Festival this week, an audience member interrupted the post-screening Q&A to tell director David Gordon Green, “Thank you for putting Nicolas Cage in a movie without C.G.I.”

Cage, who was standing on the stage with Green at the time, did not respond to the somewhat uncomfortable non sequitur. But when we met with the actor the next day in Toronto, he seemed intent on defending his action-film experimentation, as well as more than a decade’s worth of performances that many have deemed, in Cage’s words, “over the top.” (For a quick refresher, see the four-minute YouTube montage “Nicolas Cage Losing His s***,” which has amassed nearly 9.5 million views.) While the over-the-top-ness, he told us, was very intentional, 15 or so years after winning an Oscar for his heartbreaking performance in Leaving Las Vegas, Cage was ready to strip himself down again. He spent a year carefully searching for a script that would allow him to be vulnerable so he could “remind myself that I can do it and remind my audience that I can do it.”

Judging by the responses to Joe’s North American premiere on Sunday, Cage succeeded in finding that script. The gritty, Southern-set drama features Cage in the eponymous role as an ex-con struggling to maintain an honest life and restrain his simmering rage. He employs a loyal band of day laborers, and one day is approached by Gary, a hardworking 15-year-old (Tye Sheridan) desperate for a job. Joe takes Gary under his wing and quickly realizes how troubled the teenager’s family life is, a discovery that could tip Joe’s teetering inner conflict and send him in a protective rage that lands him back in prison. Our conversation with Cage is below.

Julie Miller: It was pretty incredible to be part of an audience so invested in what was happening on-screen last night. Were you pleased with the response?

Nicolas Cage: Which meant that they were with the characters. Everyone last night was really with it, with the humor and the drama, so I thought it was a really good night.

Did the character of Joe resonate with you immediately when you read the script?

Yeah, Joe did. I took a year off from work, and I was just trying to find a hundred-point script. By “hundred-point script,” I mean a script that would allow me to find the truth of the character without having to act too much. Whatever I’ve been through in my own life in the last 10 years gave me the emotional content to be able to play Joe and play the part in a very honest way. It’s no secret that I had previously been experimenting with film performance style.

What do you mean by that?

Some might call it “over the top,” but that’s a critical response that I kind of take issue with because it implies out of control. The truth is that it was by design. It was a concept to get more operatic with film performance, to use my voice in almost a heavy-metal or operatic or baroque way. To get right up against the edge of Western kabuki. I did that with Spirit of Vengeance and other movies back to back. So I said, “Well, we’ve done that. Now let’s get back to a more quiet cinéma vérité style of performance,” just so that I can remind myself that I can do it and remind my audience that I can do it. That was really what Joe gave me a chance to do.

Was there a turning point or specific catalyst that made you want to return to quieter performances?

Well, I think I just wanted to keep it eclectic. I always have. I’ve always been interested in experimentation with performance. Once I do things back to back or do things in a row, I know it’s time to re-evaluate and find another way of expressing myself. So Joe gave me a chance to do that.

 

Tye mentioned last night that you went to Texas a month before filming began to prepare. What did that preparation entail?

I wanted to get comfortable with David and his process. I wanted to rehearse with him. I wanted to spend some time with the predominantly African-American crew so it seemed like we were all one group and had all been working together for years. I wanted to find out who was going to be Gary in the movie. I got to meet Tye and spend a little time with him. You soak up the culture in Austin, somewhere there in the countryside. You get a feeling of that and get that in my body so by the time David rolled, much of the anxiety and the adrenaline was out of the way.

When you start a movie, it’s not like other kinds of work that you have when you know your boss for years or colleagues for years. You’re meeting everyone, mostly, for the first time. You have to get comfortable with those people so you can perform, because the first thing that is going to shut you down is any kind of anxiety. You have to be relaxed so you can remember your lines.

Your chemistry with the crew of workers was so great. What did you do with those guys, who were not professional actors, to familiarize yourself with them?

We would read through the scenes together. We would sit in chairs like this in a circle and talk and share stories, and get to know each other a little bit. Have some laughs. We’d talk about their lives and what their interests were like. One guy had his own barbeque shack, and he really loved his food he would cook for people. Some people had some hard lives but were actually very sophisticated and could talk about deeper things. I would say it was like a crash course in getting to know each other very, very well, so that by the time we were filming, we wouldn’t have to act.

Was it refreshing to work with “normal people” as opposed to professional actors? David said that he found many of his cast members on the street in Austin.


I thought it was great. You know, I’m not a trained actor. I’m someone who is autodidactic and learned on my own. I would look at movies and read books. These people who David found—it was because of his remarkable eye or his confidence. For example, Gary Poulter, who played [Gary’s father] Wade—he was a street performer doing his break-dancing, pop-locking moves on the street. [Laughs.] David had a real eye for knowing who was an actor or performer. And I was way up for it. I am open to any kind of experiment with the process.

Do you approach working with younger actors, like Tye, differently than you do adults?

No, I didn’t think about it in those terms. I know how serious he is about film acting, and he came in ultra-prepared. It was never going to be a situation where we were asking each other for advice. It was on from day one. I like working with young people. They haven’t had their dreams whipped out of them yet and are still confident in where their future is going. I find that energy pretty exciting to be around.

In one scene, you hold an actual poisonous snake by its head. During the Q&A, you mentioned that the encounter actually calmed you. Can you explain why?

Well, yeah. Having done some adventure movies and having had entirely too much coffee in my life, I realized that I’m one of those people where stunts and caffeine actually slow me down and relax me. I had a five-page scene of dialogue, which was a very important scene, where Gary and Joe meet each other for the first time. When I knew there was going to be a snake in the scene—and originally, he was not as in it as he ultimately is now—I said, “Well, you’re going to have a real one, right?”

They said, “We have one with venom and one without.” I said, “Well, I want the one with venom.” So did David, because it had bigger fangs and it looked better on camera. The one with no venom was kind of de-fanged. So he wanted it, but I said that I wanted to pick it up and use it in the scene. David said, “Why?” And I said, “Because it will relax me.” I realized that it wasn’t about the glory of holding a real cottonmouth snake. It was about surfing the adrenaline up to the moment of getting it in my hands so I could get control of my own anxiety and adrenaline so I could do my own five-page scene with Tye. And it worked.

That seems very dedicated on your part. Were there any mishaps with the snake?

Well, the bigger issue was that while I was holding the snake, he can also spit the poison in Tye’s face, so I had to very gently move his head in such a way so that the poison would go not in anyone’s face. That was also a complication, but what I’m very amazed by is kind of the happy accident of filmmaking. Snakes are sometimes perceived as evil, but they are also perceived as medicine. If you look at an ambulance, there’s the two snakes on the side of the ambulance. The caduceus, or the staff of Hermes, there’s the two snakes going up it, which means that the venom can also be healing. By the end of the movie, and you see the snake tattoo on Joe’s arm, and then he ultimately pays the ultimate price to save Gary’s future, the snake becomes medicine.

Lastly, the audience seemed to love seeing you in this kind of role again. Do you think you will continue on this more dramatic trajectory in your career now?


I’m going to keep trying to find movies where I don’t have to act as much, but I am also going to keep it eclectic. For me right now, I want to be very director-driven and very much a part of finding—the script can be whatever, it can be science fiction, it can be down-and-dirty drama, or it can be a comedy—but whatever it is, I want to feel like I can just play the part as honestly as possible.



__________________

 



Cage Defender

Status: Offline
Posts: 778
Date: 3:29 PM, 09/12/13
RE: Nicolas Cage on Joe, the Calming Effect of Venomous Snakes, and Why He’s Been So “Over-the-Top” in Movies Lately
Permalink  
 


It was a good read and I liked it very much. I was going to give my thoughts on something but the last question pretty much sums it up. Y'know, he's a grown man and he's allowed to do whatever he wants but you look at reviews and interviews of the last few years and they always seem to say 'remember when Nicolas Cage was in good movies?' Like, you look at all these websites talking about Joe saying 'finally Nicolas Cage reminding us why he is an Oscar winner' and on Rotten Tomatoes there is a list of the films to watch from Venice, Joe is on it and it also says 'Nicolas Cage getting serious with his films again' Eh, it just kinda bugs me but mainly I'd like him to do serious films so I can go up to the people who do the memes and go SEE? SEE? Cuz if he's nominated for an Oscar for Joe I'll be laughing. Doesnt Cage know what he's good at? He always gets praise for his dramatic roles!  

castle



__________________



NIColicious Enchantress

Status: Offline
Posts: 5669
Date: 2:33 AM, 09/13/13
RE: Nicolas Cage on Joe, the Calming Effect of Venomous Snakes, and Why He’s Been So “Over-the-Top” in Movies Lately
Permalink  
 


That`s a great interview! I enjoyed, reading it! Great find. Lady T.! :)

__________________

"When you think about magic, it is imagination plus willpower focused in such a way that you can create a conscious effect in the material world..."

Nicolas Cage




Faery Queen of Cagealot Castle

Status: Offline
Posts: 8403
Date: 3:49 AM, 09/13/13
RE: Nicolas Cage on Joe, the Calming Effect of Venomous Snakes, and Why He’s Been So “Over-the-Top” in Movies Lately
Permalink  
 


Great to read a recent interview with Nicolas and that 'Joe' is being well received.

I wish he didn't feel the need to defend himself or explain anything, or answer the critics in any way. The fans have always got it.

the snake thing is fascinating, and brave.



__________________

 

 

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page
Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard